or Create a profile

Home → SMB Enterprise (Questions) →

Should metadata be defined at the Data Schema or at the Network Schema level?

Jaime Flores's Avatar

Jaime Flores

27 May, 2010 10:12 PM via web

Should role="metadata" be defined at the Data Schema or at the Network Schema level?
Currently we defined it in both. Is that a problem?
A) Network Schema

<attribute category="discrepancy_number" role="metadata" />

B) Data Schema

<attribute category="DISCREPANCY_NUMBER" role="metadata" />

  1. Support Staff 2 Posted by Jim Fleming on 28 May, 2010 01:38 AM

    Jim Fleming's Avatar

    Jamie, 'metadata' will be ignored in the network schema, since it is a resource creation property. It tells the dataschema (the process responsible for creating the Saffron resource), to map the data to metadata (non-observable attribute). The network schema is responsible for mapping resource attributes to memory structures (e.g. memories, matrices, rows, cols). It is a bit confusing right now because we haven't migrated our config to the new language. Networkschema will become your a space definition, while the dataschema will become a resource template.
    Thanks,
    Jim

  2. Jim Fleming closed this discussion on 30 Sep, 2011 03:24 PM.

Comments are currently closed for this discussion. You can start a new one.

4 people watching.

  • New Issue

  • Conversation Started

  • The discussion is closed

    No more actions from Saffron or the discussion starter are required.

  • Re-open the discussion

Recent Discussions

29 Jun, 2011 03:54 PM obtaining [data] types
11 May, 2011 09:21 PM min and max settings.
06 May, 2011 03:36 PM Installing and Using Code Extensions (Custom Beans)
10 Mar, 2011 01:47 PM Unable to publish a space that has been copied from another cluster(4864)
03 Mar, 2011 08:02 PM Fractional date formats?

Recent Articles

SaffronSierra Billing
Amazon Payment Authorization